Skip to main content
Caplight Logo









Lab-137

Lab-137

United Stateslab-137.com

Overview

Lab-137 is a merchant bank that invests in and facilitates capital formation for early-stage companies in the hard sciences, including physics, chemistry, and biology.

Portfolio Companies

1

Investments

Lab-137 investments
CompanyDateStageLead
NuCurrentAug 2021Convertible DebtCo-investor

Sector & Stage Mix

Industry, funding stage, and valuation band breakdowns.

Premium
SeedSeries ASeries BGrowth

Portfolio analytics

Caplight clients see full sector, stage and valuation breakdowns for this investor.

Book a demo to see full analytics

For institutional investors. Book with your work email.

Investment Activity

Yearly cadence, pace, and funding raised over time.

Premium
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
2026

Portfolio analytics

Caplight clients see yearly investment pace and funding raised over time.

Book a demo to see full analytics

For institutional investors. Book with your work email.

FAQ

Where is Lab-137 based?

Lab-137 is headquartered in United States.

When was Lab-137 founded?

Founding year information for Lab-137 is not publicly available.

How many portfolio companies does Lab-137 have?

Lab-137 has 1 portfolio company in Caplight's dataset.

What are some companies in Lab-137's portfolio?

Portfolio companies visible on Caplight include NuCurrent.

What was Lab-137's most recent investment shown here?

Lab-137's most recent investment in this portfolio sample was in NuCurrent in 2021.

What sectors does Lab-137 focus on?

Lab-137 focuses on Frontier & Industrial Tech, Consumer & Commerce.

What company stages does Lab-137 focus on?

Stage focus information for Lab-137 is not publicly available.

Firmographic Details

HeadquartersUnited States
Year FoundedN/A

Institutional Data Access

Join leading institutional investors using Caplight to access private market data, discover pricing, and execute secondary block trades.

Book a demo

For institutional investors. Book with your work email.

See something wrong or outdated?